<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OregonASC.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oregonasc.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oregonasc.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 14:27:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ASC Association: Senate letter requesting data from CMS on the recent ASC conversions</title>
		<link>http://www.oregonasc.com/senate-letter-asc-conversions</link>
		<comments>http://www.oregonasc.com/senate-letter-asc-conversions#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicare/Medicaid News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregonasc.com/?p=1700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click below to read the letter. ASC Association: Senate letter requesting data from CMS on the recent ASC conversions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Click below to read the letter.</p>
<p><a href='http://www.oregonasc.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Senate-Letter.pdf' target="_blank"><strong>ASC Association: Senate letter requesting data from CMS on the recent ASC conversions</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oregonasc.com/senate-letter-asc-conversions/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ASC Association: House letter to HHS requesting modification of CMS guideline on multiple use of vials labeled for single use.</title>
		<link>http://www.oregonasc.com/house-letter-multiple-use-of-vials</link>
		<comments>http://www.oregonasc.com/house-letter-multiple-use-of-vials#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicare/Medicaid News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregonasc.com/?p=1698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click below to read the letter. ASC Association: House letter to HHS requesting modification of CMS guideline on multiple use of vials labeled for single use]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Click below to read the letter.</p>
<p><a href='http://www.oregonasc.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/House-Letter.pdf'><strong>ASC Association: House letter to HHS requesting modification of CMS guideline on multiple use of vials labeled for single use</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oregonasc.com/house-letter-multiple-use-of-vials/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2011 Oregon Patient Safety Reporting ASC Statistics Published</title>
		<link>http://www.oregonasc.com/2011-oregon-patient-safety-reporting-asc-statistics-published</link>
		<comments>http://www.oregonasc.com/2011-oregon-patient-safety-reporting-asc-statistics-published#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 19:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ASC Management Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management Knowledge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregonasc.com/?p=1665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Visit the Oregon Patient Safety Website link below to view the reporting data for 2011: http://oregonpatientsafety.org/reporting-programs/asc/ 11 of the 13 facilities listed as &#8220;exceeding reporting standards&#8221; are OASCA Members! Oregon’s Patient Safety Reporting Program is designed to collect information that can be shared and used to improve the healthcare system. Over half of all Oregon [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Visit the Oregon Patient Safety Website link below to view the reporting data for 2011:</p>
<p><a href="http://oregonpatientsafety.org/reporting-programs/asc/">http://oregonpatientsafety.org/reporting-programs/asc/</a></p>
<p><strong>11 of the 13 facilities listed as &#8220;exceeding reporting standards&#8221; are OASCA Members!</strong></p>
<p>Oregon’s Patient Safety Reporting Program is designed to collect information that can be shared and used to improve the healthcare system. Over half of all Oregon ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) have joined the Commission’s adverse event reporting program.</p>
<p>Reporting Standards</p>
<p>The standards for reporting include the quantity, quality, and timeliness of reports submitted. The 2011 ASC Reporting Standard is that all participating ASCs will submit at least one report of an adverse event or potential event. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oregonasc.com/2011-oregon-patient-safety-reporting-asc-statistics-published/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DHHS initial rules governing state-based health exchanges</title>
		<link>http://www.oregonasc.com/dhhs-initial-rules-governing-state-based-health-exchanges</link>
		<comments>http://www.oregonasc.com/dhhs-initial-rules-governing-state-based-health-exchanges#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregonasc.com/?p=1584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal Department of Health and Human Services has released a draft of the initial rules governing the state-based health exchanges. Read more here: http://cciio.cms.gov/resources/regulations/index.html#hie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal Department of Health and Human Services has released a draft of the initial rules governing the state-based health exchanges.  </p>
<p>Read more here:  <a href="http://cciio.cms.gov/resources/regulations/index.html#hie" target="_blank">http://cciio.cms.gov/resources/regulations/index.html#hie</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oregonasc.com/dhhs-initial-rules-governing-state-based-health-exchanges/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Administration Rolls Out Standards for Health Insurance Marketplaces</title>
		<link>http://www.oregonasc.com/obama-administration-rolls-out-standards-for-health-insurance-marketplaces</link>
		<comments>http://www.oregonasc.com/obama-administration-rolls-out-standards-for-health-insurance-marketplaces#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 12:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregonasc.com/?p=1581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposed rules released Monday give states wide latitude on how to create the new insurance marketplaces scheduled to open in 2014 under the federal health-care law. Click here to read more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proposed rules released Monday give states wide latitude on how to create the new insurance marketplaces scheduled to open in 2014 under the federal health-care law.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424052702304584404576440323034867608-lMyQjAxMTAxMDEwMjExNDIyWj.html" target="_blank">Click here to read more</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oregonasc.com/obama-administration-rolls-out-standards-for-health-insurance-marketplaces/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Low-Cost Orthopedic Devices, Without the Sales Pitch</title>
		<link>http://www.oregonasc.com/low-cost-orthopedic-devices-without-the-sales-pitch</link>
		<comments>http://www.oregonasc.com/low-cost-orthopedic-devices-without-the-sales-pitch#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 21:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ASC Management Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregonasc.com/?p=1579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A July 5 article in the Wall Street Journal said that &#8216;As pressure builds to restrain U.S. health costs, small companies are surfacing to offer steeply discounted orthopedic devices by forgoing expensive sales tactics. Read more here: http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20110705-709120.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A July 5 article in the Wall Street Journal said that &#8216;As pressure builds to restrain U.S. health costs, small companies are surfacing to offer steeply discounted orthopedic devices by forgoing expensive sales tactics.</p>
<p>Read more here: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20110705-709120.html" target="_blank">http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20110705-709120.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oregonasc.com/low-cost-orthopedic-devices-without-the-sales-pitch/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medicare’s 2012 Payment Proposal: Three Key Points</title>
		<link>http://www.oregonasc.com/medicare%e2%80%99s-2012-payment-proposal-three-key-points</link>
		<comments>http://www.oregonasc.com/medicare%e2%80%99s-2012-payment-proposal-three-key-points#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 18:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ASC Association News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregonasc.com/?p=1576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is from ASCA Government Affairs Update, Volume 1, Issue 18, July 7, 2011 &#160; Medicare’s 2012 Payment Proposal: Three Key Points ASC Bill Garners New Support &#160; Medicare’s 2012 Payment Proposal: Three Key Points Last Friday, the Centers for Medicare &#38; Medicaid Services (CMS) released a proposed rule outlining its 2012 payment policies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>The following is from ASCA Government Affairs Update, Volume 1, Issue 18, July 7, 2011</p>
<table style="width: 460px;" border="0" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Medicare’s   2012 Payment Proposal: Three Key Points</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>ASC   Bill Garners New Support</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
<hr size="3" />
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Medicare’s   2012 Payment Proposal: Three Key Points</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last   Friday, the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) released a   proposed rule outlining its 2012 payment policies for ASCs and HOPDs. A final   version of the proposal is expected in late October or early   November. The following are three key points the proposal raises.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Continued   Divergence between ASC and HOPD Payments</strong><br />
In its proposal, CMS continues to employ policies that have the troubling   effect of causing a disparity between what ASCs and HOPDs are paid for   providing the same services. CMS proposes to use the Consumer Price   Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) to update next year’s ASC rates to   account for inflation. In contrast, CMS proposes to use the typically   higher hospital market basket measure to update HOPD rates in   2012. Further, CMS has provided an extremely conservative estimate of   what the change in CPI-U will be next year, projecting it to increase only by   2.3%. In addition, in the proposed payment rule CMS is measuring the   health care reform law’s mandated productivity adjustment differently for   ASCs and HOPDs, leading to a 0.2 percentage point larger productivity reduction   for ASCs. All told, these disparate policies lead to HOPDs receiving a   1.5% across-the-board increase for 2012 while ASCs receive just   0.9%. The difference between ASC and HOPD rates is further exacerbated   by CMS’ decision to continue its secondary rescaling policy of reducing ASC   payment rates relative to HOPD payment rates for surgical procedures in an   attempt to maintain budget neutrality in the ASC setting. Unfortunately,   the growing divergence between what ASCs and HOPDs are paid sets up a perverse   incentive for surgical procedures to move to the more expensive HOPD setting,   costing both Medicare and its beneficiaries excess money.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>No   New Procedures Added to the List for 2012</strong><br />
CMS has proposed to add no new procedures to the list of ASC payable procedures   for 2012. In contrast, CMS has proposed to add three procedures that   have been removed from the inpatient-only list to the list of HOPD payable   procedures in 2012. ASCA will continue to advocate that CMS improve its   process for evaluating which procedures should be added to the ASC list so   that Medicare patients can take advantage of the convenience and cost savings   ASCs provide.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>ASCs   that Don’t Report Quality Data to Face Payment Reductions Beginning in 2014</strong><br />
CMS has proposed that ASCs that fail to report quality measures will face   payment reductions beginning in 2014. CMS has proposed to include all   six measures developed by the industry-led ASC Quality Collaboration in the   eight measures ASCs will be expected to report on in order to receive full   payment in 2014. The eight measures are (1) Patient Burn, (2) Patient   Fall, (3) Wrong Site, Wrong Side, Wrong Patient, Wrong Procedure, Wrong   Implant (4) Hospital Transfer/Admission, (5) Prophylactic Intravenous (IV)   Antibiotic Timing, (6) Ambulatory Surgery Patients with Appropriate Method of   Hair Removal, (7) Selection of Prophylactic Antibiotic First OR Second   Generation Cephalosporin and (8) Surgical Site Infection Rate.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Many   details regarding the ASC quality reporting program, including exactly how   ASCs will be expected to report quality data, the precise timeframe for   reporting data and how much the payment to ASCs that fail to report will be   reduced, remain unclear. ASCA is working closely with CMS to clarify the   proposed requirements, assure that quality reporting is implemented in a way   that does not place unreasonable burdens on ASCs and make certain that the   reports produce information that is meaningful to patients.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Resources   to help ASC operators understand the impact of the 2012 Medicare payment   proposal are now available on ASCA’s <a title="2012 Medicare Payment Proposal Resources" href="http://capwiz.com/ascassociation/utr/1/MWENQDFSYP/FQHNQDFYTT/7106170411" target="_blank">web site</a>.   ASCA will be conducting a webinar on Medicare’s 2012 proposal on August 23 at   1PM ET. To register, go to <a href="http://capwiz.com/ascassociation/utr/1/MWENQDFSYP/GSDBQDFYTU/7106170411">www.ascassociation.org/webinars</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For   more information, contact Jonathan Beal at <a href="<script>mg('jbeal','ascassociation.org')</script>"><script>mg('jbeal','ascassociation.org')</script></a>.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div>
<hr size="3" />
</div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>ASC   Bill Garners New Support</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>The   American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and the Outpatient   Ophthalmic Surgery Society (OOSS) have endorsed the ASC Quality and Access   Act of 2011 (H.R. 2108, S. 1173). Both organizations sent letters to   Congress expressing the need for and importance of this legislation. ASCA is   grateful for the support these respected organizations have provided toward   achieving the passage of this important legislation and is looking forward to   working together with those organizations over time.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Four   new members of Congress have recently cosponsored the ASC bill, which brings   the total number of cosponsors in the House of Representatives to 11.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Rep.   Berkley, Shelley (D-NV)<br />
Rep. Burgess, Michael (R-TX)<br />
Rep. Cassidy, Bill (R-LA)<br />
Rep. Griffin, Tim (R-AZ)<br />
Rep. Kissell, Larry (D-NC)<br />
Rep. Larson, John B. (D-CT)<br />
Rep. Marchant, Kenny (R-TX)<br />
<span style="background-color: #ffff00;">Rep. McMorris Rodgers, Cathy (R-WA)</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #ffff00;"> Rep. Nugent, Richard (R-FL)</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #ffff00;"> Rep. Roe, David P. (R-TN)</span><br />
<span style="background-color: #ffff00;"> Rep. Whitfield, Ed (R-KY)</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>ASCA   is continuing to work to gather support in the House and Senate, but we need   the assistance of all ASCA members to help advance our advocacy efforts with   strong grassroots support from back home. Please consider reaching out to   your member of Congress through our <a title="Capwiz" href="http://capwiz.com/ascassociation/utr/1/MWENQDFSYP/LRCDQDFYTV/7106170411" target="_blank">Capwiz system</a> or contact Morgan Hanson (<a href="<script>mg('mhanson','ascassociation.org')</script>"><script>mg('mhanson','ascassociation.org')</script></a> or   703.836.8808) for more information about ways you can get involved.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For   more information on the ASC Quality and Access Act of 2011, contact Steve   Miller at <a href="<script>mg('smiller','ascassociation.org')</script>"><script>mg('smiller','ascassociation.org')</script></a>.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oregonasc.com/medicare%e2%80%99s-2012-payment-proposal-three-key-points/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Proposed Medicare Payment Rates Released</title>
		<link>http://www.oregonasc.com/2012-proposed-medicare-payment-rates-released</link>
		<comments>http://www.oregonasc.com/2012-proposed-medicare-payment-rates-released#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 19:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ASC Association News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregonasc.com/?p=1572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CMS released CY2012 proposed payment rule using CPI-U, 0.9%; HOPDs get 1.5%. Click here to read more. 2012 Proposed Medicare Payment Rates Released &#160; This afternoon, the Centers for Medicare &#38; Medicaid Services (CMS) released the CY 2012 proposed payment rule for ASCs and hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs). We are disappointed in the agency’s continued [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CMS released CY2012 proposed payment rule using CPI-U, 0.9%; HOPDs get 1.5%.  <a href="http://ascassociation.org/medicare2012/" target="_blank">Click here to read more.</a><br />
<span id="more-1572"></span></p>
<div>
<table style="width: 401px;" border="0" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>2012 Proposed Medicare Payment Rates Released</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>
<table style="width: 474px; height: 1665px;" border="0" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width: 480px;">This afternoon, the Centers for Medicare   &amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) released the CY 2012 proposed payment rule for   ASCs and hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs).  We are disappointed   in the agency’s continued reliance on the Consumer Price Index for All Urban   Consumers (CPI-U) to update ASC payments, which, this year, results in a   proposed update of 0.9%. Also, the rule establishes a requirement for ASC   quality reporting.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Continued Use of CPI-U for ASCs</strong></p>
<p>CMS has proposed to continue to base the   ASC inflation update on the CPI-U while basing the HOPD’s inflation update on   the health care specific hospital market basket measure. This decision, in   combination with a new policy to use a separate estimate for the statutorily   mandated productivity for ASCs and HOPDs, results in ASC’s receiving a 0.9% update   compared to HOPDs receiving a 1.5% update.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The Ambulatory Surgery Center Association   (ASCA) has been highly critical of the agency’s continued reliance on the   CPI-U to update ASC payments since the payment system was originally   implemented. The hospital market basket is a more appropriate measure of   inflation for ASCs and has typically been higher than the   CPI-U.  Previous updates and adjustments had pushed ASC rates down   to 56 percent of HOPD rates last year, and the continued use of the CPI-U,   compounded by different measures of multifactor productivity for ASCs and   HOPDs, will likely push the gap even wider in 2012.  ASCA is extremely   disappointed that the agency has continued to ignore the widening gap in   payments for outpatient surgical services in these two settings.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>ASC operators should keep in mind that   the change in the rates paid for individual procedures at individual ASCs   will vary by region beyond the 0.9% across-the-board update due to other   factors, such as the change in the relative costs of the procedures and   changes in wage index values.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Quality Reporting</strong></p>
<p>For 2012, CMS has proposed a voluntary,   confidential quality reporting program for ASCs. The agency proposes 7   measures, including all 6 measures developed by the industry-led ASC Quality   Collaboration.  For 2013 and subsequent years, however, CMS has proposed   that ASCs that fail to report required quality measures will have their   payment rates for the next year reduced.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>There are several important issues in the   rule that we will be evaluating as we review the proposal in   detail. Below is a brief recap of some additional key issues.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>1.        <strong>Inflation   Update:</strong> By staying with the CPI-U update and estimating a low level of inflation   (contrary to most economic indicators), the agency has set an update of 0.9   percent that will continue to erode the ASC payments relative to the HOPD   rates. The hospital market basket is projected to be 2.8 percent, but the   reform law requires it to be reduced by the hospital’s productivity factor of   1.2 and an additional 0.1 percent, leaving the HOPD update at 1.5 percent.</p>
<p>2.        <strong>Productivity   Adjustment:</strong> As required by the health reform law, ASC rates are reduced by a measure of   economy-wide productivity gains (a 10-year rolling average calculated by the   Bureau of Labor Statistics). CMS estimates this adjustment will be 1.4   percent in 2012. The agency has introduced a new policy to use a separate   estimate of productivity for the outpatient and ASC setting, meaning that the   assumption of productivity gains for the ASC setting is higher than the   assumed productivity gains for hospitals.</p>
<p>3.        <strong>Conversion   Factor: </strong>After   taking into account the update and productivity adjustments, CMS further   adjusts the conversion factor to account for budget neutrality in the   recalibration of the wage index. The ASC conversion factor for 2012 will   rise to $42.329.</p>
<p>4.        <strong>Scaling   of ASC Relative Weights:</strong> Each year, CMS applies a ‘secondary’ budget   neutrality calculation to the ASC relative weights to ensure that changes to   the Ambulatory Payment Classifications relative weights under the hospital   outpatient payment system do not result in an aggregate increase or decrease   in payments. CMS estimates the scaling factor for 2012 to be 0.9373.</p>
<p>5.        <strong>Wage   Index:</strong> CMS continues to use the pre-floor, pre-reclassified wage index to adjust ASC   payments for geographic differences in the relative cost of labor. The   differences in some markets is particularly pronounced because of a policy in   the health reform law that sets the hospital wage index for inpatient and   outpatient services in so-called “frontier states” at 1.0. The states   affected by the frontier wage index policy include Montana, Wyoming, North   Dakota, South Dakota and Nevada.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>CMS published the information below in   Table 53 of its proposed rule to show the estimated impact on ASC payments   for the most common procedures. As you can see, many high-volume procedure   rates will go down while payments for other services will increase   significantly.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>ASCA staff will continue to review the   896-page proposed rule and will provide updates on the ASCA web site in the   days and weeks ahead.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table style="width:480px;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom"><strong>HCPCS     Code*</strong><strong> </strong></td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom"><strong>Short     Descriptor</strong><strong> </strong></td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom"><strong>Estimated     CY 2011 ASC Payments (in millions) </strong><strong> </strong></td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom"><strong>Estimated     CY 2012 Percent Change</strong><strong> </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">66984</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Cataract surg w/iol, 1 stage</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$1,083</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">43239</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Upper GI endoscopy,   biopsy</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$158</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">-3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">45380</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Colonoscopy and biopsy</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$133</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">45378</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Diagnostic colonoscopy</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">100</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">45385</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Lesion removal colonoscopy</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$87</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">66982</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Cataract surgery,   complex</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$79</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">62311</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Inject spine l/s (cd)</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$66</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">64483</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Inj foramen epidural   l/s</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$66</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">66821</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">After cataract laser   surgery</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$56</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">15823</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Revision of upper   eyelid</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$41</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">64493</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Inj paravert f jnt l/s 1 lev</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$40</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">63650</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Implant neuroelectrodes</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$38</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">-5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">G0105</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Colorectal scrn; hi   risk ind</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$32</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">29881</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Knee   arthroscopy/surgery</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$31</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">29826</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Shoulder   arthroscopy/surgery</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$31</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">64721</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Carpal tunnel surgery</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$30</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">29827</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Arthroscop rotator cuf repr</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$27</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">29880</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Knee   arthroscopy/surgery</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$26</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">63685</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Insrt/redo spine n   generator</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$26</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">-1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">G0121</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Colon ca scrn not hi   rsk ind</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$25</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">45384</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Lesion remove   colonoscopy</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$24</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">43235</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Uppr gi endoscopy,   diagnosis</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$23</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">-3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">52000</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Cystoscopy</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$20</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">28285</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Repair of hammertoe</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$19</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">64622</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Destr paravertebrl   nerve l/s</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$19</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">64590</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Insrt/redo pn/gastr   stimul</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$16</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">-1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">62310</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Inject spine c/t</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$16</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">26055</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Incise finger tendon   sheath</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$16</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">50590</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Fragmenting of kidney   stone</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$15</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="78" valign="bottom">67042</td>
<td width="277" valign="bottom">Vit for macular hole</td>
<td width="87" valign="bottom">$14</td>
<td width="94" valign="bottom">3%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oregonasc.com/2012-proposed-medicare-payment-rates-released/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quality and Access Act 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.oregonasc.com/quality-and-access-act-2011</link>
		<comments>http://www.oregonasc.com/quality-and-access-act-2011#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 03:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ASC Association News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregonasc.com/?p=1558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Overview of the ASC Industry ASC Legislation ASCs Commitment to Quality The Value of Physician Ownership ASC Access Act Summary Access Act of 2011 Section by Section]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.oregonasc.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/An-Overview-of-the-ASC-Industry.pdf' target="_blank">An Overview of the ASC Industry</a></p>
<p><a href='http://www.oregonasc.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/ASC-Legislation-Final.pdf' target="_blank">ASC Legislation</a></p>
<p><a href='http://www.oregonasc.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/ASCs-Commitment-to-Quality.pdf' target="_blank">ASCs Commitment to Quality</a></p>
<p><a href='http://www.oregonasc.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/The-Value-of-Physician-Ownership.pdf' target="_blank">The Value of Physician Ownership</a></p>
<p><a href='http://www.oregonasc.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/ASC-Access-Act-Summary.pdf' target="_blank">ASC Access Act Summary</a></p>
<p><a href='http://www.oregonasc.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Access-Act-of-2011-Section-by-Section.pdf' target="_blank">Access Act of 2011 Section by Section</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oregonasc.com/quality-and-access-act-2011/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Prepared Patient Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.oregonasc.com/prepared-patient-forum</link>
		<comments>http://www.oregonasc.com/prepared-patient-forum#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patient Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oregonasc.com/?p=1553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Prepared Patient Forum resources make it easier to find good care and get the most out of it. The Forum is part of the Center for Advancing Health (CFAH). CFAH has advocated for patients and health care consumers since 1992. Click here to visit the site.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>Prepared Patient Forum</em> resources make it easier to find good care and get the most out of it. The Forum is part of the Center for Advancing Health (CFAH). CFAH has advocated for patients and health care consumers since 1992.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.preparedpatientforum.org/" target="_blank">Click here</a> to visit the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oregonasc.com/prepared-patient-forum/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

